Interactive prototype retired from public testing

The audit found missing production configuration, non-durable session state, inaccurate architecture labels, and insufficient upload disclosure. Public upload and question endpoints have been removed.

Technical demonstration record

Single-document Q&A prototype

This page documents what the repository-backed prototype actually did and why it is not presented as a live, production, private, semantic-vector, or client-proven system.

Implemented architecture

01

Extract

PDF text or UTF-8 content entered a server route.

02

Chunk

Text was split into overlapping character windows.

03

Retrieve

TF-IDF/cosine lexical matching selected three chunks.

04

Generate

Selected text was sent to Groq with the question.

What can be said

  • A document-chat interface and server route existed
  • PDF extraction and temporary lexical retrieval were implemented
  • The selected context was used in a Groq request
  • The code is evidence of a personal technical prototype

What is not claimed

  • Client delivery or adoption
  • Production readiness, privacy, or compliance
  • Semantic embeddings, durable vector storage, or citations
  • Accuracy, latency, throughput, cost, or time-saving results

Need a real private-knowledge pilot?

Start with approved sources, representative questions, a data-flow decision, an evaluation set, and a bounded user group.

Review the RAG pilotRequest assessment